A Man Like No Other
How inclusive a unit one considers in speaking of group-membership determinants is purely a function of the level of abstraction at which one is operating at a given time.
John Ryan: ‘I’ve had to wait like no other man in the team’
Some of the personality traits which tend to distinguish the members of a given group from humanity as a whole derive from a distinctive biological heritage. Persons who live together are more likely to have the same genes than are persons who live far apart. If the physical vitality is typically low for one group as contrasted with other groups, or if certain types of endocrine imbalance are unusually frequent, the personalities the members of that group will probably have distinctive qualities. In the greater number of cases, however, the similarities of character within a group are traceable less to constitutional factors than to formative influences of the environment to which all members of the group have been subjected.
Of these group-membership determinants, culture is with little doubt the most significant.
Women Automotive Summit: A Global Event Like No Other
To say that "culture determines" is of course, a highly abstract way of speaking. What one actually observes is the interaction of people. One never sees "culture" any more than one sees "gravity. Those who have be trained in childhood along traditional lines, and even those who have as adults adopted some new design for living, will be apt to behave predictably in many contexts because of a prevailing tendency to conform to group standards.
Of course we are speaking here of general tendencies rather than invariable facts.
- A man like no other;
- A Math Genius Like No Other Comes to the Big Screen - Scientific American Blog Network!
- Lunar Meteoroid Impacts and How to Observe Them (Astronomers Observing Guides);
- Law for Non-Law Students.
- No Comprendo Spain Part II.
- When Other Women Want Your Man.
- Post navigation.
If there were no variations in the conception and applications of cultural standards, personalities formed in a given society would be more nearly alike than they actually are. Culture determines only what an individual learns as a member of a group - not so much what he learns as a private individual and as a member of a particular family.
Because of these special experiences and particular constitutional endowments, each person's selection from and reaction to cultural teachings have an individual quality. What is learned is almost never symmetrical and coherent, and only occasionally it is fully integrated. Deviation from cultural norms is inevitable and endless, for variability appears to be a property of all biological organisms. Before leaving the group-membership determinants, we must remind the reader once more that this conception is merely a useful abstraction. In the concrete, the individual personality is never directly affected by the group as a physical totality.
Rather, his personality is modified by the particular members of the group with whom he has personal contact and by his conceptions of the group as a whole. Some traits of group members are predictable - in a statistical sense - from knowledge of the biological, social, and cultural properties of the group. But no single person is ever completely representative of all the characteristics imputed to the group as a whole. Concretely, not the group but group agents with their own peculiar traits determine personality formation.
Of these group agents, the most important are the parents and other members of the individual's family. They, we repeat, act as individuals, as members, of a group, and as members of a sub-group with special characteristics the family itself. The culture defines how the different functions, or roles, necessary to group life are to be performed - such roles, for example, as those assigned on the basis of sex and age, or on the basis of membership in a caste, class, or occupational group.
In a sense, the role determinants of personality are a special class of group-membership determinants; they apply to strata that cross-cut most kinds of group membership. The long-continued playing of a distinctive role, however, appears to be so potent in differentiating personalities within a group that it is useful to treat these determinants separately. Moreover, if one is aware of the role determinants, one will less often be misled in interpreting various manifestations of personality. In this connection it is worth recalling that, in early Latin, persona means "a mask " - dramatis personae are the masks which actors wear in a play, that is, the characters that are represented.
See a Problem?
Etymologically and historically, then, the personality is the character that is manifested in public. In modern psychology and sociology this corresponds rather closely to the role behavior of a differentiated person. From one point of view, this constitutes a disguise. Just as the outer body shields the viscera from view, and clothing the genitals, so the public personality shields the private personality from the curious and censorious world. It also operates to conceal underlying motivations from the individual's own consciousness.
The person who has painfully achieved some sort of integration, and who knows what is expected of him in a particular social situation, will usually produce the appropriate responses with only a little personal coloring.
This explains, in part, why the attitudes and action patterns produced by the group-membership and role determinants constitute a screen which, in the case of normal individuals, can be penetrated only by the intensive, lengthy, and oblique procedures of depth psychology. The disposition to accept a person's behavior in a given situation as representative of his total personality is almost universal.
Very often he is merely conforming, very acceptably, to the cultural definition of his role. Besides the constitutional determinants and the forces which will more or less inevitably confront individuals who live in the same physical environment, who are members of a society of a certain size and of a certain culture, and who play the same roles, there are things which "just happen" to people. Even casual contacts of brief duration "accidental" i. A student, say, who is undecided as to his career, or who is about equally drawn to several different vocations, happens to sit down in a railroad car next to a journalist who is an engaging and persuasive advocate of his profession.
This event does not, of course, immediately and directly change the young man's personality, but it may set in motion a chain of events which put him into situations that are decisive in molding his personality. The situational determinants include things that happen a thousand times as well as those that happen only once -provided they are not standard for a whole group. For example, it is generally agreed that the family constellation in which a person grows up is a primary source of personality styling. These domestic influences are conditioned by the cultural prescriptions for the roles of parents and children.
But a divorce, a father who is much older than the mother, a father whose occupation keeps him away from home much of the time, the fact of being an only child or the eldest or youngest in a series - these are situational determinants. Contact with a group involves determinants which are classified as group-membership or situational, depending on the individual's sense of belongingness or commitment to the group.
The congeries of persons among whom a man accidentally finds himself one or more times may affect his personality development but not in the same manner as those social units with which the individual feels himself allied as a result of shared experiences or of imaginative identification. However, the phrase has unfortunate implications. A dualism is implied, whereas "culture in personality" and "personality in culture" would suggest conceptual models more in accord with the facts.
Moreover, the slogan favors a dangerous simplification of the problems of personality formation. Recognition of culture as one of the determinants of personality is a great gain, but there are some indications that this theoretical advance has tended to obscure the significance of other types of determinants.
A balanced consideration of "personality in nature, society, and culture" must be carried on within the framework of a complex conceptual scheme which explicitly recognizes, instead of tacitly, excluding, a number of types of determinants. But it must also not be forgotten that any classification of personality determinants is, at best, a convenient abstraction. A few illustrations of the intricate linkage of the determinants will clarify this point. For example, we may instance a network of cultural, role, and constitutional determinants.
In every society the child is differently socialized according to sex.
Also, in every society different behavior is expected of individuals in different age groups, although each culture makes its own prescriptions as to where these lines are drawn and what behavioral variations are to be anticipated. Thus, the personalities of men and women, of the old and the young, are differentiated, in part, by the experience of playing these various roles in conformity with cultural standards. But, since age and sex are biological facts, they also operate throughout life as constitutional determinants of personality.
A woman's motivations and action patterns are modified by the facts of her physique as a woman. Therefore, a woman who wants to stay in a man's life must remember that she shouldn't make fun of him, interrupt him in public, or make fun of him in any other way The women who act like this most probably will never have a beautiful relationship because they keep blowing off a man's candle just to strengthen the fire of their own. And that is very ugly and wrong.
Thus, the appearance and body language attracts a man, and embracing his ego makes you feel loved and irreplaceable for life. The journalists that were interviewing me kept asking how I managed to seduce a millionaire that I was married to in Los Angeles. I was his best friend. He would feel much stronger while attending business or personal meetings with me than without me I was his loyal supporter and friend.
Unfortunately, he was too old for me, so our needs were incompatible. I was seeking for true love and a deep, long-term relationship. I really like men. Over the years, I have learned that men can pretend to be superheroes, machos, etc. If you learn to accept his weaknesses and sensitive side and help him feel stronger, he will forever love you. Next level games So, now that we've talked about short and effective tricks that will surely help you become a desirable woman, let's move on to the next level and discuss the qualities of a woman who is so WOW and so VIP that she does not need to play any games.
- Data Protection Choices.
- A Man Like No Other (Fanfic) - TV Tropes;
- like no other;
- A Man Like No Other by R Allen | Koorong;
- alt-J - Nara Lyrics | SongMeanings;
Such a woman is precious on her own; a man loves and adores her and makes an effort to keep her with him and feel loved. There is no other way! You need to attain the level of a worthy woman, and to reveal the quality and beauty within you, you have to work for it.https://caybackmodacha.ml
Remembering Tim Hoare – a man like no other
Get rid of the internal rubbish, work on your attitude, care for your energetics, learn some communication secrets, etc. A worthy woman can get rid of a man's fears and support him when he hits a rocky road. A woman who works on her inner world knows that it makes no sense to accuse someone else of her problems; she must always ask herself how she got into that situation. After all, you must have noticed that bitter women attract bitter men, tired women attract men that exploit them even the more or in exceptional cases, comfort them , masculine women attract feminine men, etc.
So, if you can attain the next level, there's going to be plenty of men in your life and if you already have a man, he will become much more attentive and loving, and you won't have to play any games. You will understand deep down in your heart that you're a worthy and valuable woman, and you don't have to cling to a man; it is him that must work hard for you because you are the diamond in his life as soon as you start thinking in line with this practice, the situation will change.
A woman who is self-confident is sending a very clear signal to a man:. You have to make an effort for this woman since there's always going to be other men that might need this wonderful woman.